The answer seems to be...Nothing! Failure, in my mind at least, is a subjective action that thrives on one's own dis-satisfaction. Failure will not sift the good art from the bad. Honestly, why would one be interested in strictly focusing on all the good artworks? Would one not learn more if they also analyze the artworks of supposedly "lower value/significance"? It seems to me that our fabricated artistic culture has developed this hierarchical method of critiquing artworks - "if it ain't pretty then its trash". I have also noticed that different time periods have significant impacts on how one views artistic failure. During the Renaissance, for instance, painters would focus on realism and dis-regard any other "style". Now, look at the 20-21st century! - digital art, traditional art, performance art, mechanical art, etc. Consequently, identifying failure in Visual Arts is much like defining the meaning of life - opinions shift overtime; hence no concrete argument is formulated. In reality, failure is something of a myth.

Having that said, I would strongly agree that "failure" is also success and vice-versa, which may explain why failure is often associated with progress, as stated by Gary himself. What do you all think? I would really like to see how far we can delve into this topic by combining our brain power...

Yevgeny

Tags: art, arts, failure, frustration, timeline, visual

Views: 8

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You pretty much said most of what needs to be said about " failure " . The word failure is negative , and I dont use it . As you said , it's a state of mind dealing with a 100% subjective profession . Art evolves . Its like the use of language , what the starch collar, square britches say is the official and correct way and the contemporary the incorrect way is an incorrect statement . The contemporary becomes the correct way if the people speaking and writing it use it . To prove my point , find an english dictionary from the early 1970's and compare it with one today . You will be surprised to find how many new words there are now and even the definitions of old word usage . What was originally slang are now official words . I read a very interesting article of the fact that British english is considered the correct form but almost all foreign nations today that hire educators to teach english abroad to their children specifically ask that American english be taught .Art like the artist evolves ( or at least should ), there is no failure simply a path of understanding your abilities and what direction you need to go in order to make yourself better . Look at a painting you did at age 14 and compare it to one you have done recently or many years past that age . Your old painting is not crude or a failure ,its where you were then and a measure of how much you have successfully grown . You have to crawl before you can walk as they say . When I " fail " , I say to myself " well at least I learned something " that something that may help you later on .
Great points, Tracy
I think the only time the word 'failure' should be used in visual artists is when an artist 'fails' to get his message across in his work... but that is dependent on if the artist has a message to convey! A lot of people don't, for many it is all about the visuals!

It's all a game of trial and error and solving the visual jigsaw puzzle...just got to keep moving the pieces around until it fits together! Failure is not an option!
failure in anything is giving up or not willing to try to push what you know. Doesn't matter if it's the visual arts, accounting, garbage collecting, etc. The willingness to learn from mistakes, grow in knowledge and wisdom and develop as a person is why progress is associated with failure. In visual arts you see many people who have only partial knowledge of how to go out into the world and make a living as an artist fail because when it comes right down to it ... they give up. A good analogy would be a person knowing how to cut stuff with a handsaw, he/she picks up a chainsaw and thinks they know how to cut trees down for a living. Same is true for artists ... in todays market you need to know more than just how to draw/paint/sculpt/etc, you need to know business skills, time management skills, marketing skills, etc. Most don't want to know or think they have to know anything about that and that if they paint well the people and sales will come to them ... and they don't ... after a while they give up and fade away in the art world ... which is why there is a 94% rate of artists who stop doing art for a living within 5 years. 3% go into the applied arts (silk screening, sign businesses, graphic design, air brushing, etc) 2% go into teaching (that broken down is 75% in kindergarden to 12th grade and 25% into the college system) leaving 1% that actually stay a working artist in the world after 5 years. Not to say that the 94% that quit are failures ... i know alot of people that are still trying to grow, trying to learn and trying to push themselves for the day when they can go back into art and leave their construction/barista/retail/cubical jobs and try to make it on what they are passionate about. I myself fall into the 3 percent that went into the applied arts and even I hope to one day start making a living solely off of my art and ideas and not making art based on others ideas or needs.

And failed art pieces is pretty much the same ... unless a piece is completely unsalvagable (throwing on the wheel and flopping a pot, breaking a peice of stone in half and that half shatters, rip in the canvas, etc) the piece can still be worked on and made better or changed .... giving up is really the only failure. Failure on unsalvagable pieces would only be not learning from the mistake that happened.

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Music

Loading…

HERE ARE 2 LINKS to TWO of my youtube videos talking and demonstrating about this amazing product:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIc02QBihJQ&feature=share&list=UUM6N5AOYoyg6eAkbcDWpNFg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zAPZn5TEyM&list=UUM6N5AOYoyg6eAkbcDWpNFg&index=41

So once i have my image printed onto transparency film, I take my Ezscreen silk screen which has been coated in light sensitive emulsion (These sheets come pre-coated so they are ready to use). Place it onto a black board, then place the transparency image on top (this part needs to be done in a dark room with no direct sunlight). I take it outside and expose it for 1 minute and 40 seconds (but time varies depending on time of day and strength of sunlight). After i have exposed the image i place it into a tub of water for around 5 - 8 minutes. Then i rinse the screen out under fast running water until the unexposed area (the black) washes away. I then expose the screen to the sun for a further 20mins to completely harden the light sensitive emulsion. 

And this is the completed screen ready for printing.  I simply use an old credit card to spread the ink over the screen making sure i do one complete full stroke across the screen (holding the credit card at a 45 degree angle). I immediately wash the screen out under fast flowing water and pat dry. I use fabric screen printing ink which washes out in water (which makes the process easy).

I love this product, their website is http://ezscreenprint.com/ (for full instructions and details on how to purchase this awesome product).

© 2013   Created by Greef.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Feedback scroll to the top Skysa Website Social Bar /* inserts buttons below status update */